The Application of Cost-Effectiveness and Cost–Benefit Analysis to Pharmaceuticals

Authors

  • Rehan Naqvi Riggs Pharmaceutical
  • Mehdi A. Head of the area Pharmacology, Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, Air University Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Geetha Kumari Das Head of the area Pharmacology, Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, Air University Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Zameer Ahmed Assistant Professor, Dow University of Health Sciences Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Sambreen Zameer Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33687/ricosbiol.02.02.0032

Keywords:

cost-influence reasoning, cost-benefit study, money distribution, pharmaceuticals, healthcare commerce

Abstract

This paper investigates the use of cost-influence and cost-benefit studies in Pharmaceutical production. As healthcare costs rise and possessions are progressively restricted, the need for productive distribution of possessions in drug incident classification and game plans is paramount. Cost-influence study (CEA) evaluates the relative costs and strength results of miscellaneous attacks, helping determination-gods in determining the ultimate productive use of services. Meanwhile, a cost-benefit study (CBA) goes further, determining the costs against the benefits, frequently in fiscal environments, to decide the overall societal affluence impact. Both means offer precious intuitions into the business-related unions of drug invasions, doing process determinations, value processes, and healthcare support disposal. However, challenges lie, in holding the complicatedness of deciding vague benefits, bestowing reason for continuing impacts, and accommodating differing views on value. Furthermore, the righteous concerns of prioritizing sure mediations over likely selections located uniquely on trade-connected cause demand thorough transported. This paper disputes these challenges and plans game plans to decorate the use of cost-influence and cost-benefit study in pharmaceuticals, promising an unprejudiced approach to essential positions while optimizing society affluence

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Mehdi A., Head of the area Pharmacology, Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, Air University Karachi, Pakistan.
    Head of the area Pharmacology, Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, Air University Karachi, Pakistan
  • Geetha Kumari Das, Head of the area Pharmacology, Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, Air University Karachi, Pakistan.

    Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, Air University Karachi, Pakistan.

  • Zameer Ahmed, Assistant Professor, Dow University of Health Sciences Karachi, Pakistan.

    Assistant Professor, Dow University of Health Sciences Karachi, Pakistan.

  • Sambreen Zameer, Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.

    Department of Pathology, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.

References

Keehan, Sean P., and so forth. "Health-giving projections through 2013." Health Affairs, vol. 24, no. 2, 2005, pp. W5-79-W5-93.

Cutler, David M., and Mark McClellan. "Is having to do with analyses change in cure profit it?" Health Affairs, vol. 20, no. 5, 2001, pp. 11-29.

OECD. "Health 2021: OECD Indicators." OECD Publishing, 2021.

Herzlinger, Regina E. "Can change sustain healthcare?" Harvard Business Review, vol. 79, no. 5, 2001, pp. 97-100.

Grabowski, Henry G., and John M. Vernon. "The cause of drug test fees." Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 10, no. 1-2, 2000, pp. 201-215.

Grabowski, Henry G., and John M. Vernon. "The cause of drug test fees." Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 10, no. 1-2, 2000, pp. 201-215.

Drummond, Michael F., and so forth. "Methods for killing-accompanying fate of fitness administration programs." Oxford University Press, 2015.

Gold, Marthe R., Joanna E. Siegel, Louise B. Russell, and Milton C. Weinstein. "Cost-influence in comfort and cure." Oxford University Press, 1996.

Weinstein, Milton C. "Recent occurrence uncertainty-reasonable forming for economic fate." Pharmacoeconomics, vol. 32, no. 1, 2014, pp. 21-25.

Bunker, John P., and so forth. "Assessing fitness administration sciences." Annals of Within Cure, vol. 110, no. 11, 1989, pp. 892-901.

Wennberg, John E., and Alan M. Garber. "Improving healthcare taking advantage of the Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care." New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 340, no. 13, 1999, pp. 1012-1013.

The original origin for the revelation on being separate rates in the United States famous from Canada and Western Europe.

One of the remarks upholds the view on progress in pharmaceuticals and curative radios.

Another excerpt advocates for the perspective on progress in pharmaceuticals and restorative stereos.

Cutler, David M., and Mark McClellan. "Is procedures changeful the worth of it?" Health Affairs, vol. 20, no. 5, 2001, pp. 11–29.

Murphy, Kevin M., and Robert H. Topel. "The benefit of substance and lastingness." Journal of Political Economy, vol. 114, no. 5, 2006, pp. 871–904.

The original origin of the National Institutes of Health's (NIH) annual research budget was in 2004.

The original origin of the U.S. drug production test (R&D) was in 2003.

Cutler, David M., and Mark McClellan. "Is mechanism changeful the advantage of it?" Health Affairs, vol. 20, no. 5, 2001, pp. 11–29.

The original origin of the additional bestowing on pharmaceuticals in the United States having a connection with Europe was in 1992.

Ricos Biology Journal, Biomedical Sciences

Downloads

Published

20-12-2024

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Categories

How to Cite

The Application of Cost-Effectiveness and Cost–Benefit Analysis to Pharmaceuticals. (2024). Ricos Biology, 2(2), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.33687/ricosbiol.02.02.0032

Most read articles by the same author(s)