Targeted Horizons in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): A Comprehensive Review of Passive Immunotherapy from Monoclonal Antibodies to Anti‑Idiotype Networks

Authors

  • Eman A. Khairy Microbiology and Immunology Dept., National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt, 12622
  • Abouelhag H. A. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt, 12622

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33687/ricosbiol.04.04.118

Keywords:

systemic lupus erythematosus, passive immunotherapy, monoclonal antibodies, anti-idiotype antibodies, B-cell depletion, anifrolumab, belimumab, obinutuzumab, CAR-T therapy, type I interferon, autoimmune disease, precision medicine.

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease driven by dysregulated B‑cell activation, autoantibody production, and type I interferon signalling. For decades, treatment relied on non‑specific immunosuppressants and corticosteroids, which carry substantial toxicity and often fail to control disease. The past two decades have seen a paradigm shift with the emergence of passive immunotherapies that precisely target pathogenic pathways. This review provides a comprehensive overview of passive immunotherapy for SLE, covering monoclonal antibodies targeting B cells (rituximab, obinutuzumab, belimumab), cytokine pathways (anifrolumab), co‑stimulatory molecules, and emerging cellular therapies including CAR‑T cells. Recent network meta‑analyses show that telitacicept (odds ratio [OR] 5.2 for SRI‑4 response), anifrolumab (OR 1.6 for BICLA), and deucravacitinib (OR 1.6 for BICLA) are superior to standard therapy in moderate‑to‑severe SLE. The Phase III TULIP‑SC trial of subcutaneous anifrolumab achieved a 56.2% BICLA response rate vs. 37.1% for placebo (p=0.0002), with 29.0% attaining DORIS remission. The REGENCY Phase III trial of obinutuzumab in proliferative lupus nephritis demonstrated a complete renal response rate of 46.4% vs. 33.1% (p=0.02). A distinctive emerging frontier is the revival of anti‑idiotype antibody therapy—rooted in Jerne’s network theory—which aims to neutralise pathogenic autoantibodies or selectively eliminate autoreactive B‑cell clones, as supported by murine models and natural anti‑idiotypes in IVIg. Despite these advances, disease heterogeneity and the lack of standardised definitions for refractory SLE remain major challenges. CAR‑T therapy has shown encouraging early remission rates in refractory SLE, though long‑term safety and durability are uncertain. This review synthesises mechanisms, clinical evidence, safety profiles, guideline recommendations, and future directions, highlighting the potential of precision immunotherapies—including anti‑idiotype strategies—to achieve sustained remission in SLE.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Eman A. Khairy, Microbiology and Immunology Dept., National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt, 12622

    Microbiology and Immunology Dept., National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt, 12622

  • Abouelhag H. A., Department of Microbiology and Immunology, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt, 12622
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt, 12622

References

2025 American college of Rheumatology (ACR) guideline for the treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. (2025). Rheum Now. https://doi/epdf/10.1002/acr.25690

Anti CD20 therapy: Where are we today? (2025). Lupus Science & Medicine, 12(Suppl 1), A15.1. https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2025-el.123

AstraZeneca. (2026, January). Saphnelo self administration TULIP SC trial demonstrates statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction in systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2026/saphnelo-self-administration-tulip-sc-trial-demonstrates-statistically-significant-clinically-meaningful-reduction-sle-disease-activity.html

B cell targeted therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus: Current status and perspectives. (2025). Biochemical Pharmacology, 239, 117018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2025.117018

Blank, M., Nur, I., Meidler, R., Slutzki, L., Bar, L., & Shoenfeld, Y. (2005). Peptide mimetics of anti dsDNA idiotypes as a tool for lupus specific IVIG preparation: Specificity and efficacy in the treatment of experimental systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 7(Suppl 1), P10. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar1531

Casadevall, A., Dadachova, E., & Pirofski, L. A. (2015). Passive antibody therapy for infectious diseases. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 13(4), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3428

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus: Mechanisms, clinical advances, and future directions. (2025). Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, 68, 103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-025-09042-6

Danieli, M. G., Claudi, I., Buti, E., Gammeri, L., Gangemi, S., & Shoenfeld, Y. J. (2025). Natural autoantibodies and their functional therapeutic roles in intravenous immunoglobulin. Frontiers in Aging, 6, 1682457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2025.1682457

Efficacy and safety of biologics for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): A systematic review and network meta analysis. (2025). Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, 68, 70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-025-09035-5

Fanouriakis, A., Kostopoulou, M., Andersen, J., Aringer, M., Arnaud, L., Bae, S. C., Boletis, J., Bruce, I. N., Cervera, R., Doria, A., Gordon, C., Inês, L., Isenberg, D., Jacobsen, S., Kuhn, A., van Vollenhoven, R., & Boumpas, D. T. (2024). EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus: 2023 update. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 83(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2023-224762

Guo, C., Li, M., & Zhang, X. (2026). Precision immunotherapies for systemic lupus erythematosus: From pathogenic targets to translational horizons. Autoimmunity Reviews, 25(4), 104029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2026.104029

Huang, H. (2023). Immunotherapeutic approaches for systemic lupus erythematosus: Early overview and future potential. Medical Review, 3(6), 452–464. https://doi.org/10.1515/mr-2023-0035

Human immunoglobulin therapy in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus and active tuberculosis: Case report. (2026). Lupus Science & Medicine, 13(Suppl 1), A123. https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2026-el.123

Krysov, S. (2026, January 13). Reviving anti idiotype antibody therapy for autoimmune diseases [LinkedIn post]. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/reviving-anti-idiotype-antibody-therapy-autoimmune-diseases-krysov-phd/

Mastalerz, J. A., Wojciechowska, K., & Szepietowski, J. C. (2025). Novel therapies in SLE treatment: A literature review. Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 34(10), 1769–1781. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/190123

Murphy, W. J., Longo, D. L., & Kohler, H. (2025). The past, present, and future of anti idiotype antibodies. Frontiers in Immunology, 16, 1686107. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1686107

Pan, L., Lu, M. P., Wang, J. H., Xu, M., & Yang, S. R. (2020). Immunological pathogenesis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. World Journal of Pediatrics, 16(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-019-00289-3

Parodis, I., Gómez, A., & Gunnarsson, I. (2023). B cell tolerance and targeted therapies in SLE. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(19), 6268. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196268

Pathogenic anti DNA idiotype reactive IgG in intravenous immunoglobulin preparations. (1994). Clinical and Experimental Immunology, 97(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2249.1994.tb06573.x

Pelletier, J. P. R., & Mukhtar, F. (2023). Passive monoclonal and polyclonal antibody therapies. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK572246/

Shoenfeld, Y., Rauova, L., Gilburd, B., Kvapil, F., Goldberg, I., Kopolovic, J., Rovensky, J., & Blank, M. (2002). Efficacy of IVIG affinity purified anti double stranded DNA anti idiotypic antibodies in the treatment of an experimental murine model of systemic lupus erythematosus. International Immunology, 14(11), 1303–1311. https://doi.org/10.1093/intimm/dxf099

Suppression of experimental systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with specific anti idiotypic antibody–saporin conjugate. (1994). Clinical and Experimental Immunology, 97(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2249.1994.tb06573.x

Tanaka, Y. (2025). Novel therapies in treatments of SLE. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 39(4), 102101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2025.102101

Xing, Z., Gao, S., Zheng, A., Tong, C., Fang, Y., Xiang, Z., Chen, S., Wang, W., & Hua, C. (2024). Promising roles of combined therapy based on immune response and iron metabolism in systemic lupus erythematosus. International Immunopharmacology, 133, 112481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112481

Zandman Goddard, G., Blank, M., & Shoenfeld, Y. (2009). Intravenous immunoglobulins in systemic lupus erythematosus: From the bench to the bedside. Lupus, 18(10), 884–889. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203309106921

Targeted Horizons in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): A Comprehensive Review of Passive Immunotherapy from Monoclonal Antibodies to Anti Idiotype Networks

Downloads

Published

27-04-2026

Data Availability Statement

As a narrative review, this manuscript synthesizes and discusses previously published data. No novel datasets were created or analyzed. All data referenced herein can be found in the original research articles cited in the reference list.

How to Cite

Targeted Horizons in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): A Comprehensive Review of Passive Immunotherapy from Monoclonal Antibodies to Anti‑Idiotype Networks. (2026). Ricos Biology, 4(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.33687/ricosbiol.04.04.118

Similar Articles

31-40 of 78

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>