Beneficial Implementation of Probiotics in Farm Animals and Poultry Husbandry

Authors

  • Ehab A. Fouad Department of Zoonosis, National Research Centre, 33 Bohouth St., Dokki, Cairo, Postal code 12622, Egypt
  • Magdy A. Kamel Department of Microbiology and Immunology, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt
  • Ashraf S. Hakim Department of Microbiology and Immunology, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33687/ricosbiol.01.01.0016

Keywords:

Probiotics, Mechanism of Probiotic, Probioticsselectin criteria

Abstract

Probiotics have become highly realized as additives for livestock because of their beneficial impacts on health and well-being. The current article aims to provide knowledge about the potential probiotic microbial strains referred to their relation to animal health. Lactic acid bacteria are the most regularly used microorganisms as probiotics, "besides other microbiota including certain fungi" which can be obtained from human, animal, plant, and environment. Not all microbiota be a good probiotic but there are main selection criteria for any potential probiotic microorganism. Nowadays, probiotics are used on large scale as growth promoters
and productivity enhancers in both poultry and farm animals. Finally, the promising probiotic must achieve the safety status for humans or animals and lack of antibiotic resistance genes transfer.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Alayande, K.A.; Aiyegoro, O.A. and Ateba, C.N. (2020): Probiotics in Animal Husbandry: Applicability and Associated Risk Factors. Sustainability, 12(3), 1087.

2. Market Report (2021): Probiotics in animal feed market by livestock (poultry, ruminants, swine, aquaculture and pets), source (bacteria and yeast), form (dry, liquid) and region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, South America, & rest of world) - global forecast to 2026. http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/probiotics-animal-feed-market-85832335.html

3. Mannetje, L. (2010): Silage for animal feed. In: Encyclopedia of life support systems [Online], vol 8. Eolss Publishers, Oxford, pp 123–135. http://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters /c17/E6-58-07-05.pdf

4. Lilly, D.M. and Stillwell, R.H. (1965): Probiotics: Growth promoting factors produced by microorganisms. Science. 147:747-748.

5. FAO (2016): Probiotics in animal nutrition. Production, impact and regulation. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No. 179 Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5933e.pdf

6. Abdel-Raheem, S.M; Abd-Allah, S.M. and Hassanein, K.M. (2012): The effects of prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic supplementation on intestinal microbial ecology and histomorphology of broiler chickens. International Journal for Agro Veterinary and Medical Sci., 6(4): 277-289.

7. Abdel-Rahman, H.; Shawky, S.; Ouda, H.; Nafeaa, A., and Orabi, S. (2013): Effect of two probiotics and bioflavonoids supplementation to the broilers diet and drinking water on the growth performance and hepatic antioxidant parameters. Global Veterinaria, 10(6): 734-741.

8. Ahmed M.S., Ahmed R.E. and Sherin I. (2016): Pharmacokinetics, Bio¬Equivalence and tissue residues of two oral colistin formulations in broiler chickens. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci., 8(4): 166-170.

9. Barko, P.C.; McMichael, M.A. and Swanson, K.S. (2018): The gastrointestinal microbiome: a review. J Vet Intern Med., 32:9–25.

10. Zoumpopoulou, G.; Kazou, M.; Alexandraki, V.; Angelopoulou, A.; Papadimitriou, K.; Pot, B. and Tsakalidou, E. (2018): Probiotics and Prebiotics: An Overview on Recent Trends. Probiotics and Prebiotics in Animal Health and Food Safety 1-34. ISBN 978-3-319-71948-1, ISBN 978-3-319-71950-4 (eBook).

11. Chaucheyras-Durand, F. and Ossa, F. (2014): Review: the rumen microbiome composition, abundance, diversity, and new investigative tools. Prof Anim Sci., 30:1–12.

12. Deusch, S.; Tilocca, B.; Camarinha-Silva, A. and Seifert, J. (2015): News in livestock research use of omics-technologies to study the microbiota in the gastrointestinal tract of farm animals. Comput Struct Biotechnol J., 13:55–63.

13. Jami, E.; White, B.A. and Mizrahi, I. (2014): Potential role of the bovine rumen microbiome in modulating milk composition and feed efficiency. PLoS One, 9(1):e85423.

14. Landers, T.F.; Cohen, B.; Wittum, T.E. and Larson, E.L. (2012): A review of antibiotic use in food animals: perspective, policy, and potential. Public Health Rep., 127(1):4–22.

15. Papatsiros, V.G.; Katsoulos, P.D.; Koutoulis, K.C.; Karatzia, M., Dedousi, A. and Christodoulopoulos, G. (2013): Alternatives to antibiotics for farm animals. CAB Rev., 8:1–15.

16. Van Boeckel, T.P.; Brower, C.; Gilbert, M.; Grenfell, B.T.; Levin, S.A.; Robinson, T.P.; Teillant, A. and Laxminarayan, R. (2015): Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 112(18):5649–5654.

17. Haque MH, Sarker S, Islam MS, Islam MA, Karim MR, Kayesh MEH, Shiddiky MJA, Anwer MS. Sustainable Antibiotic-Free Broiler Meat Production: Current Trends, Challenges, and Possibilities in a Developing Country Perspective. Biology (Basel). 2020 Nov 23;9(11):411.

18. Robles-Jimenez LE, Aranda-Aguirre E, Castelan-Ortega OA, Shettino-Bermudez BS, Ortiz-Salinas R, Miranda M, Li X, Angeles-Hernandez JC, Vargas-Bello-Pérez E, Gonzalez-Ronquillo M. Worldwide Traceability of Antibiotic Residues from Livestock in Wastewater and Soil: A Systematic Review. Animals (Basel). 2021 Dec 28;12(1):60.

19. Azabo R, Dulle F, Mshana SE, Matee M, Kimera S. Antimicrobial use in cattle and poultry production on occurrence of multidrug resistant Escherichia coli. A systematic review with focus on sub-Saharan Africa. Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:1000457.

20. Wang O, McAllister TA, Plastow G, Stanford K, Selinger B, Guan LL. Interactions of the Hindgut Mucosa-Associated Microbiome with Its Host Regulate Shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 by Cattle. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Dec 15; 84(1):e01738-17.

21. Ngo TT, Bang NN, Dart P, Callaghan M, Klieve A, McNeill D. Pellets Inoculated with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens H57 Modulates Diet Preference and Rumen Factors Associated with Appetite Regulation in Steers. Animals (Basel). 2021 Dec 4; 11(12):3455.

22. Zhang, R.; Zhou, M.; Tu, Y.; Zhang, N.F.; Deng, K.D.; Ma, T. and Diao, Q.Y. (2015): Effect of oral administration of probiotics on growth performance, apparent nutrient digestibility and stress-related indicators in Holstein calves. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr., 100(1):33–38.

23. Ayad, M.A.; Benallou, B.; Saim, M.S.; Smadi, M.A. and Meziane, T. (2013): Impact of feeding yeast culture on milk yield, milk components, and blood components in Algerian dairy herds. J Vet Sci Technol., 4(2):1–5.

24. Maragkoudakis, P.A.; Mountzouris, K.C.; Rosu, C.; Zoumpopoulou, G.; Papadimitriou, K.; Dalaka, E.; Hadjipetrou, A.; Theofanous, G.; Strozzi, G.P.; Carlini, N.; Zervas, G. and Tsakalidou, E. (2010): Feed supplementation of Lactobacillus plantarum PCA 236 modulates gut microbiota and milk fatty acid composition in dairy goats-a preliminary study. Int J Food Microbiol., 141(Suppl 1):S109– S116.

25. Ort SB, Aragona KM, Chapman CE, Shangraw E, Brito AF, Schauff DJ, Erickson PS. The impact of direct-fed microbials and enzymes on the health and performance of dairy cows with emphasis on colostrum quality and serum immunoglobulin concentrations in calves. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2018 Apr; 102(2):e641-e652.

26. Espeche, M.C.; Pellegrino, M.; Frola, I.; Larriestra, A.; Bogni, C. and Nader-Macias, M.E. (2012): Lactic acid bacteria from raw milk as potentially beneficial strains to prevent bovine mastitis. Anaerobe, 18(1):103–109.

27. Steinberg RS, Silva LCSE, de Souza MR, Reis RB, Bicalho AF, Nunes JPS, Dias AAM, Nicoli JR, Neumann E, Nunes ÁC. Prospecting of potentially probiotic lactic acid bacteria from bovine mammary ecosystem: imminent partners from bacteriotherapy against bovine mastitis. Int Microbiol. 2022 Jan;25(1):189-206.

28. Alazzeh, A.Y.; Sultana, H.; Beauchemin, K.A.; Wang, Y.; Holo, H.; Harstad, O.M. and McAllister, T.A. (2012): Using strains of Propionibacteria to mitigate methane emissions in vitro. Acta Agric Scand Sect A Anim Sci 62(4):263–272.

29. Doyle N, Mbandlwa P, Kelly WJ, Attwood G, Li Y, Ross RP, Stanton C, Leahy S. Use of Lactic Acid Bacteria to Reduce Methane Production in Ruminants, a Critical Review. Front Microbiol. 2019 Oct 1;10:2207.

30. Spaniol, J.; Oltramari, C.; Locatelli, M.; Volpato, A.; Campigotto, G.; Stefani, L. and Da Silva, A. (2015): Influence of probiotic on somatic cell count in milk and immune system of dairy cows. Comp Clin Pathol., 24(3):677–681.

31. Apas, A.L.; Gonzalez, S.N. and Arena, M.E. (2014): Potential of goat probiotic to bind mutagens. Anaerobe, 28:8–12.

32. Prazdnova EV, Mazanko MS, Chistyakov VA, Bogdanova AA, Refeld AG, Kharchenko EY, Chikindas ML. Antimutagenic Activity as a Criterion of Potential Probiotic Properties. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2022 Dec; 14(6):1094-1109.

33. Rafat, A. and Hussain, M.A. (2013): Environmental ethics in animal farming: agricultural probiotics. Am J Agric Sci., 1:1–6.

34. Puniya, A.K.; Salem, A.Z.M.; Kumar, S.; Dagar, S.S.; Griffith, G.W.; Puniya, M.; Ravella, S.R.; Kumar, N.; Dhewa, T. and Kumar, R. (2015): Role of live microbial feed supplements with reference to anaerobic fungi in ruminant productivity: a review. J Integr Agric., 14(3):550–560.

35. Praesteng, K.E.; Pope, P.B.; Cann, I.K.; Mackie, R.I.; Mathiesen, S.D.; Folkow, L.P.; Eijsink, V.G. and Sundset, M.A. (2013): Probiotic dosing of Ruminococcus flavefaciens affects rumen microbiome structure and function in reindeer. Microb Ecol., 66(4):840–849.

36. Moraïs S, Cockburn DW, Ben-David Y, Koropatkin NM, Martens EC, Duncan SH, Flint HJ, Mizrahi I, Bayer EA. Lysozyme activity of the Ruminococcus champanellensis cellulosome. Environ Microbiol. 2016 Dec;18(12):5112-5122.

37. Chuang WY, Lin WC, Hsieh YC, Huang CM, Chang SC, Lee TT. Evaluation of the combined use of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus oryzae with phytase fermentation products on growth, inflammatory, and intestinal morphology in broilers. Animals (Basel). 2019 Dec 1; 9(12):1051.

38. Jatkauskas, J. and Vrotniakiene, V. (2010): Effects of probiotic dietary supplementation on diarrhea patterns, fecal microbiota and performance of early-weaned calves. Vet Med Czech, 55:494–503.

39. Bouchard, D.S.; Rault, L. and Berkova, N. (2013): Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus invasion into bovine mammary epithelial cells by contact with live Lactobacillus casei. Appl Environ Microbiol., 79:877–885.

40. Du R, Jiao S, Dai Y, An J, Lv J, Yan X, Wang J, Han B. Probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens C-1 Improves Growth Performance, Stimulates GH/IGF-1, and Regulates the Gut Microbiota of Growth-Retarded Beef Calves. Front Microbiol. 2018 Aug 28;9: 2006.

41. Kawauchi D, Angthong W, Keaokliang O, Ishida T, Takahashi T, Kawashima T. Effect of feeding Bacillus subtilis on rumen fermentation, blood metabolites, nutrient digestibility, and energy and nitrogen balances in non-lactating crossbred cows. Anim Sci J. 2021 Jan; 92(1):e13531.

42. Zábranský, L.; Poborská, A; Gálik, B.; Šoch, M.; Brož, P.; Kantor, M.; Kernerová, N.; Rezáˇc, I ;ˇRolinec, M.; Hanušovský, O.; et al. Influence of Probiotic Strains Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Enterococcus on the Health Status and Weight Gain of Calves, and the Utilization of Nitrogenous Compounds. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1273.

43. Hassan, A.; Gado, H.; Anele, U.Y.; Berasain, M.A.M. and Salem, A.Z.M. (2020): Influence of dietary probiotic inclusion on growth performance, nutrient utilization, ruminal fermentation activities and methane production in growing lambs. Anim. Biotechnol., 31(4):365-372.

44. Hansen H. H., El-Bordeny N. E., and Ebeid H.M. (2017): Response of primiparous and multiparous buffaloes to yeast culture supplementation during early and mid-lactation. Anim Nutr., 3(4):411-418.

45. Duarte ME, Kim SW. Intestinal microbiota and its interaction to intestinal health in nursery pigs. Anim Nutr. 2022 Mar;8(1):169-184.

46. Luo Y, Ren W, Smidt H, Wright AG, Yu B, Schyns G, McCormack UM, Cowieson AJ, Yu J, He J, Yan H, Wu J, Mackie RI, Chen D. Dynamic Distribution of Gut Microbiota in Pigs at Different Growth Stages: Composition and Contribution. Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Jun 29; 10(3):e0068821.

47. Ngunjiri JM, Taylor KJM, Abundo MC, Jang H, Elaish M, Kc M, Ghorbani A, Wijeratne S, Weber BP, Johnson TJ, Lee CW. Farm Stage, Bird Age, and Body Site Dominantly Affect the Quantity, Taxonomic Composition, and Dynamics of Respiratory and Gut Microbiota of Commercial Layer Chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019 Apr 18;85(9):e03137-18.

48. Du W, Deng J, Yang Z, Zeng L, Yang X. Metagenomic analysis reveals linkages between cecal microbiota and feed efficiency in Xiayan chickens. Poult Sci. 2020 Dec;99(12):7066-7075.

49. Laustsen L, Edwards JE, Hermes GDA, Lúthersson N, van Doorn DA, Okrathok S, Kujawa TJ, Smidt H. Free Faecal Water: Analysis of Horse Faecal Microbiota and the Impact of Faecal Microbial Transplantation on Symptom Severity. Animals (Basel). 2021 Sep 23;11(10):2776.

50. Mach N, Lansade L, Bars-Cortina D, Dhorne-Pollet S, Foury A, Moisan MP, Ruet A. Gut microbiota resilience in horse athletes following holidays out to pasture. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 3;11(1):5007.

51. ASML A, Agazzi A, Invernizzi G, et al. The beneficial role of Probiotics in monogastric animal nutrition and health. J Dairy Vet Anim Res. 2015;2(4):116-132.

52. Liu H, Wang S, Zhang D, Wang J, Zhang W, Wang Y, Ji H. Effects of dietary supplementation with Pediococcus acidilactici ZPA017 on reproductive performance, fecal microbial flora and serum indices in sows during late gestation and lactation. Anim Biosci. 2020 Jan; 33(1):120-126.

53. Nam NH, Truong ND, Thanh DTH, Duan PN, Hai TM, Dao BTA, Sukon P. Bacillus subtilis QST 713 supplementation during late gestation in gilts reduces stillbirth and increases piglet birth weight. Vet Med Int. 2022 Jun 6; 2022:2462241.

54. Kim, K.H.; Ingale, S.L.; Kim, J.S.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, J.H.; Kwon, I.K. and Chae, B.J. (2014b): Bacteriophage and probiotics both enhance the performance of growing pigs but bacteriophage are more effective. Anim Feed Sci Technol., 196:88–95.

55. Yin, F.; Farzan, A. and Wang, Q.C. (2014): Reduction of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 infection in experimentally challenged weaned pigs fed a Lactobacillus-fermented feed. Foodborne Pathog Dis., 11:628–634.

56. Kantas, D.; Papatsiros, V.G. and Tassis, P.D. (2015): A feed additive containing Bacillus toyonensis (Toyocerin®) protects against enteric pathogens in post weaning piglets. J Appl Microbiol., 118:727–738.

57. Bardina, C.; Spricigo, D.A.; Cortes, P. and Llagostera, M. (2012): Significance of the bacteriophage treatment schedule in reducing Salmonella colonization of poultry. Appl Environ Microbiol., 78(18):6600–6607.

58. Marietto-Gonçalves, G.; Curotto, S.M.R.; Baptista, A.; Donato, T.; Takahira, R.; Sequeira, J. and Andreatti Filho, R. (2014): Effects of lactobacillus probiotic, P22 bacteriophage and Salmonella typhimurium on the heterophilic burst activity of broiler chickens. Rev Bras Cienc Avic., 16:257–264.

59. Li T, Castañeda CD, Miotto J, McDaniel C, Kiess AS, Zhang L. Effects of in ovo probiotic administration on the incidence of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli in broilers and an evaluation on its virulence and antimicrobial resistance properties. Poult Sci. 2021 Mar; 100(3):100903.

60. Hamad, G.M.; Abdelmotilib, N.M.; Darwish, A.M.G. and Zeitoun, A.M. (2020): Commercial probiotic cell-free supernatants for inhibition of Clostridium perfringens poultry meat infection in Egypt. Anaerobe, 62:102181.

61. Bali V, Panesar PS, Bera MB, Kennedy JF. Bacteriocins: Recent Trends and Potential Applications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016; 56(5):817-34.

62. Majhi S. (2020). Immuno-modulation under synbiotic supplementation in coloured broilers. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, (2012) 47(2): 164-167.

63. Wieërs G, Belkhir L, Enaud R, Leclercq S, Philippart de Foy JM, Dequenne I, de Timary P, Cani PD. How Probiotics Affect the Microbiota. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Jan 15; 9:454.

64. Ashaolu, T.J. (2020): Immune boosting functional foods and their mechanisms: A critical evaluation of probiotics and prebiotics. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy, (130) 110625.

65. Nwobodo, D.C. and Ugwu, M.C. (2020): Immunomodulatory Potentials of Probiotics: A Review. Asian Journal of Immunology, 3(2): 1-15.

66. Mountzouris K.C.,Tsirtsikos P., Kalamara E., Nitsch S., Schatzmayr G. and Fegeros K. (2007): Evaluation of the efficacy of a probiotic containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus and Pediococcus strains in promoting broiler performance and modulating cecal microflora composition and metabolic activities. Poult Sci., 86(2): 309-317.

67. Ghasemi, H.A.; Shivazad, M.; Esmaeilnia, K.; Kohram, H. and Karimi, M.A. (2010): The effects of a synbiotic containing Enterococcus faeciumand inulin on growth performance and resistance to coccidiosis in broiler chickens. J. Poultry Sci., 47(2), 149-155.

68. Ohland, C.L. and Macnaughton, W.K. (2010): Probiotic bacteria and intestinal epithelial barrier function. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol., 298:G807–G819.

69. Anadón, A.; Martínez-Larrañaga, M.R.; Arés, I. and Martínez, M.A. (2016a): Chapter 1. Prebiotics and probiotics: an assessment of their safety and health benefits. In: Ross Watson R, Preedy VR (eds) Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics. Bioactive foods in promoting health: probiotics and prebiotics. Academic, San Diego, CA; 3–23.

70. Ciorba, M.A. (2012): Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association , 10(9):960-8.

71. Anadón, A.; Martínez-Larrañaga, M.R. and Aresi, M.M.A. (2016b): Chapter 55. Probiotics: safety and toxicity considerations. In: Gupta RC (ed) Nutraceuticals: efficacy, safety and toxicity. Academic, Amsterdam, pp 777–853.

72. Delgado, S.; Sánchez, B.; Margolles, A.; Ruas-Madiedo, P. and Ruiz, L. (2020): Molecules produced by probiotics and intestinal microorganisms with immunomodulatory activity. Nutrients J., 12(2): 391.

73. Vermeiren, L.; Devlieghere, F.; Vandekinderen, I. and Debevere, J. (2006): The interaction of the non-bacteriocinogenic Lactobacillus sakei 10A and lactocin S producing Lactobacillus sakei 148 towards Listeria monocytogenes on a model cooked ham. Food Microbiol., 23:511–518.

74. Elsser-Gravesen, D. and Elsser-Gravesen, A. (2014): Biopreservatives. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 143:29–49

75. Goncalves, A.T. and Gallardo-Escarate, C. (2017): Microbiome dynamic modulation through functional diets based on pre- and probiotics (mannan-oligosaccharides and Saccharomyces cerevisiae) in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J Appl Microbiol., 122:1333–1347

76. Sohier M. Syame, Asmaa S. Mansour, Wahid H. El-Dabae, Nagwa S. Atta, Ashraf S. Hakim and Doaa D. Khalaf. Detection, purification and characterization of newly bacteriocin by lactic acid bacteria isolated from dairy products in Egypt, a promising approach in food biopreservation World Appl. Sci. J., 39 (3): 93-102, 2021.

Ricos Biology Journal

Downloads

Published

28-06-2023 — Updated on 28-06-2023

Versions

How to Cite

Beneficial Implementation of Probiotics in Farm Animals and Poultry Husbandry . (2023). Ricos Biology, 1(1), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.33687/ricosbiol.01.01.0016